Oil exploration activity in Brazil dates back to the second half of the 19th century. The oil industry in Brazil has endured distinct development phases, in terms of legislative evolution, each one featured by specific legislative frameworks consolidating a particular exploration and production model, according to each period. One possible chronological segmenting is described below:
Colonial Period Manueline Ordinances - Regalian System
A mining regime prevailed in which ownership of subsoil and soil mineral resources is dissociated. Subsoil is owned by the sovereign, who can authorize its exploration by any individual through decrees establishing the rules of such concession.
The Regalian System, of feudal origin, singles out the sovereign's personal interest and prevailed in Brazil from the colonial period until 1891, when the Federal Constitution went into effect. Established in the Manueline Ordinances, it provided that soil and subsoil were of distinct ownership - the latter belonging to the Portuguese Crown, which, in turn, could explore it directly or delegate (grant) its exploration.
Regalian mineral rights are a system of mining rights in which mineral resources underground are separate from the overlying land and are owned by the sovereign, who may authorize exploitation of those minerals by private parties under decrees establishing concession rules.
The Imperial Constitution of 1824 lacked clear rules on mining rights in Brazil. Article 179 (XXVI), which governed rights in inventions and discoveries, seemed to indicate that the constituent assembly had adopted a system providing full ownership of property. However, the prevalent understanding in legal theory remained that ownership of land included surface rights only.
The Imperial Constitution of 1824 can therefore be understood as having introduced a "dominal" system which, unlike the regalian system, confers on the State rather than on the Crown the ownership of mineral resources, the extraction of which must be in the interests of society.
Under Decree 3.352-A of 1864, Emperor D. Pedro II granted "Thomaz Denuy Sargent the right to, either himself or through companies, extract peat, oil and other minerals in the municipalities of Camamú and Ilhéus, in the Province of Bahia, over a term of 90 years." In 1872, Imperial Decree 5.014 granted Luiz Mateus Maylakki coal and oil rights in the Province of São Paulo, in the municipalities of Sorocaba, Itapetininga and Itu. In 1888, Decree 10.073/1888 granted Tito Lívio Martins oil rights in Bofete, in the municipality of Tatuí, São Paulo.
Land or Access System (Article 72, § 17, Subparagraph "a") Article 72(17, "a") of the first Constitution of the Brazilian Republic introduced the "accession system" of mining rights in Brazil (with the exception of legal reserves):
"Except
as otherwise provided by law, a mine shall be the property of and
may
be exploited by the owner of the overlying land".
Whoever owns the land also owns the mineral resources and other resources beneath it, unless a legal reserve has been established.
The system was substantially influenced by the US system of mining rights, which privileges private interests in land ownership. The resources held beneath the ground are an accessory to the overlying land, and are equivalent to the fruits of the land in the legal sense of the term. However, the fruits (underground resources) of the land are often more valuable than the land itself.
The accession system was moderated by the Civil Code in 1916, by the Calógeras Act and by the Mining Act.
In 1907, the Brazilian Geological and Mineralogical Service was created by Federal Act 6.323.
The Calógeras Act of 1915 created the first mining regulations in Brazil. It separated ownership of the land from ownership of the resources beneath it, allowing mineral resources to be expropriated separately from the land. The Act covered all "mineral or fossil masses existing beneath or on the surface of the land", including "coal, graphite, lignite and mineral oils".
Decree-Act 4,265/1921 was Brazil''s first Mining Act. It defines mines as "mines proper"... "fossil fuels" and "other substances of high industrial value."
Federal Constitution of 1934
The Federal Constitution of 1934 was influenced by the Mexican Constitution of 1917 and the recognition of oil as a strategic asset for national security following World War I.
Article 118 separates ownership of land from ownership of the mineral resources beneath it:"Ownership of mines and underground wealth and of
waterfalls shall be
separate from ownership of the land for the
purpose of industrial
exploitation or use."
Natural resources are owned, controlled, managed and granted for exploitation by the State.
In the wake of the 1917 Mexican Constitution and after World War I, when oil became a strategic asset for State security.
Unequivocal separation between the ownership of the soil and that of the natural resources found in the subsoil.
Natural resources are in the public domain of the State, which must care for controlling, inspecting and granting their exploration and production.
Legislative Frameworks:
- Definition of the terms "deposit" and "mine"; sorting of the deposits by type, including "solid fossil fuels", "bituminous and pyrobetuminous rocks", and "oil and natural gas".
- Specific chapter for the "oil and natural gas deposits" later added through Decree-Law No. 366/1938.
- Article 97. "Oil and natural gas deposits possibly found within national territory belong to the States or to the Union, as a private, imprescriptible domain, as per the following parameters:".
Law No. 2,004/1953 Petrobras is established
· Federal Constitution of 1967 (Art. 162)
Article 162 of the Federal Constitution of 1967 established a monopoly on oil exploration and production.
Art. 162 of the Federal Constitution of 1967 raised the monopoly on the research and extraction of oil and natural gas to the level of constitutional mandate.
1988 Federal Constitution: absolute state monopoly (Articles 176 and 177)
Law No. 9478/1997 Oil Act
- The first well is drilled into the Pre-salt geological environment.
- The well was drilled at the Parati Prospect (Block BM-S-10), but would prove to be noncommercial.
Marketing of Federal Government equity oil and gas
The concessions then granted fully differed from the current ones. Currently denominated "archaic concessions", they were featured by a long or even indeterminate validity, tied to the oil field marketability, by the amplitude of granted areas, by the lack of obligatory exploratory investments and by the single royalties'' payment compensation by the concession holder to the host State or to its sovereign authority.